Python for image processing on Wikipedia

[Luis Pedro Coelho]

While looking for something else, I ran across this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_image_processing_software

and added the Python column.

I think some of the "No"s could be turned into "Yes"s, except that I don't
know all about all Python packages.

*

I don't even understand what some of the headings are supposed to mean and I
work in computer vision research as they seem incredibly generic. For example,
"Image validate", "Image adjustment", ...

Best,

[Karol M. Langner]

That's an awfully long list...

Post by Luis Pedro Coelho
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_image_processing_software
and added the Python column.
I think some of the "No"s could be turned into "Yes"s, except that I don't
know all about all Python packages.
*
I don't even understand what some of the headings are supposed to mean and I
work in computer vision research as they seem incredibly generic. For example,
"Image validate", "Image adjustment", ...
Best,
--
Luis Pedro Coelho | Institute for Molecular Medicine | http://luispedro.org
--

[nhv-WP2X+]

If we could figure how best to wrap https://code.google.com/p/imagestack/
a lot of those No's would turn to Yes

Post by Luis Pedro Coelho
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_image_processing_software
and added the Python column.
I think some of the "No"s could be turned into "Yes"s, except that I don't
know all about all Python packages.
*
I don't even understand what some of the headings are supposed to mean and I
work in computer vision research as they seem incredibly generic. For example,
"Image validate", "Image adjustment", ...
Best,
--
Luis Pedro Coelho | Institute for Molecular Medicine |
http://luispedro.org
--

--

[Andreas Mueller]

Post by nhv-WP2X+
If we could figure how best to wrap https://code.google.com/p/imagestack/
a lot of those No's would turn to Yes

Just going through scikit-image and opencv would probably turn most nos
to yes.

Post by nhv-WP2X+

Post by Luis Pedro Coelho
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_image_processing_software
and added the Python column.
I think some of the "No"s could be turned into "Yes"s, except that I don't
know all about all Python packages.
*
I don't even understand what some of the headings are supposed to mean and I
work in computer vision research as they seem incredibly generic. For example,
"Image validate", "Image adjustment", ...
Best,
--
Luis Pedro Coelho | Institute for Molecular Medicine |
http://luispedro.org
--

--

[Luis Pedro Coelho]

Received: by 10.216.28.135 with SMTP id g7mr1121339wea.72.1350573854944;
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 08:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: pythonvision-/***@public.gmane.org
Received: by 10.180.105.1 with SMTP id gi1ls897860wib.2.canary; Thu, 18 Oct
2012 08:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.181.12.101 with SMTP id ep5mr1746653wid.1.1350573854508;
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 08:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.181.12.101 with SMTP id ep5mr1746652wid.1.1350573854496;
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 08:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx03.ul.pt (mx01.ul.pt. [194.117.3.98])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bu8si1775257wib.2.2012.10.18.08.24.13
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 08:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 194.117.3.98 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of luis-lDyIkTiGk8zrZ44/***@public.gmane.org) client-ip=194.117.3.98;
Received: from mx.anubis.local (ste [10.1.2.2])
by mx03.ul.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA56378423
for <pythonvision-/***@public.gmane.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:23:42 +0100 (WEST)
Received: from peterrabbit.localnet (peterrabbit.fm.ul.pt [10.105.84.17])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx.anubis.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84A637836C
for <pythonvision-/***@public.gmane.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:23:42 +0100 (WEST)
User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-32-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <50801E34.6090601-T6EGJOV9q4e6hr9I/***@public.gmane.org>
X-Original-Sender: luis-lDyIkTiGk8zrZ44/***@public.gmane.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
194.117.3.98 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain
of luis-lDyIkTiGk8zrZ44/***@public.gmane.org) smtp.mail=luis-lDyIkTiGk8zrZ44/***@public.gmane.org
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list pythonvision-/***@public.gmane.org; contact pythonvision+owners-/***@public.gmane.org
List-ID: <pythonvision.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1008694279917
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/pythonvision/post?hl=en-US>, <mailto:pythonvision-/***@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en-US>, <mailto:pythonvision+help-/***@public.gmane.org>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/pythonvision?hl=en-US>
Sender: pythonvision-/***@public.gmane.org
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/pythonvision/subscribe?hl=en-US>,
<mailto:pythonvision+subscribe-/***@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/pythonvision/subscribe?hl=en-US>,
<mailto:googlegroups-manage+1008694279917+unsubscribe-/***@public.gmane.org>
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.pythonvision/107>

Post by Andreas Mueller

Post by nhv-WP2X+
If we could figure how best to wrap https://code.google.com/p/imagestack/
a lot of those No's would turn to Yes

Just going through scikit-image and opencv would probably turn most nos
to yes.

Yes!

That's what I was hoping to do with my message: provoke someone who knows
skimage & opencv in depth to go over the list (I know skimage in passing
only).

[Thouis (Ray) Jones]

Post by Luis Pedro Coelho
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_image_processing_software
and added the Python column.

I think a better ideas is to mark the article for deletion (and I've
done so), as it's meaningless (any of those algorithms could be coded
in python, matlab, or mathematica), it doesn't list arguably more
popular image processing tools (e.g., ImageJ, OpenCV), and the list
seems arbitrarily constructed. Far better would be to add links from
each of the algorithms' pages to the software that implements that
particular algorithm.

Ray Jones

--

[Luis Pedro Coelho]

Received: by 10.68.189.37 with SMTP id gf5mr5640344pbc.16.1350579568324;
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: pythonvision-/***@public.gmane.org
Received: by 10.68.141.79 with SMTP id rm15ls1065967pbb.1.gmail; Thu, 18 Oct
2012 09:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.90.36 with SMTP id bt4mr5863886pab.5.1350579567671;
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.90.36 with SMTP id bt4mr5863884pab.5.1350579567662;
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a44.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com. [208.113.200.5])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id q7si95575paz.0.2012.10.18.09.59.27;
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 208.113.200.5 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of luis-lDyIkTiGk8zrZ44/***@public.gmane.org) client-ip=208.113.200.5;
Received: from homiemail-a44.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by homiemail-a44.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3897A11805C;
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from peterrabbit.localnet (ulaanbaatar.dreamhost.com [69.163.239.125])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: luis-lDyIkTiGk8zrZ44/***@public.gmane.org)
by homiemail-a44.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0466311806F;
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-32-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAHGWWxEku91RrEoMyi=bVchrPDbiKRoj8rwFu=LHO_+C-t+m6A-JsoAwUIsXosN+***@public.gmane.org>
X-Original-Sender: luis-lDyIkTiGk8zrZ44/***@public.gmane.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
208.113.200.5 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain
of luis-lDyIkTiGk8zrZ44/***@public.gmane.org) smtp.mail=luis-lDyIkTiGk8zrZ44/***@public.gmane.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@luispedro.org
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list pythonvision-/***@public.gmane.org; contact pythonvision+owners-/***@public.gmane.org
List-ID: <pythonvision.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1008694279917
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/pythonvision/post?hl=en-US>, <mailto:pythonvision-/***@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en-US>, <mailto:pythonvision+help-/***@public.gmane.org>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/pythonvision?hl=en-US>
Sender: pythonvision-/***@public.gmane.org
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/pythonvision/subscribe?hl=en-US>,
<mailto:pythonvision+subscribe-/***@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/pythonvision/subscribe?hl=en-US>,
<mailto:googlegroups-manage+1008694279917+unsubscribe-/***@public.gmane.org>
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.pythonvision/109>

Fair enough.

It is a pretty bad article as it is.

Luis

Post by Thouis (Ray) Jones
I think a better ideas is to mark the article for deletion (and I've
done so), as it's meaningless (any of those algorithms could be coded
in python, matlab, or mathematica), it doesn't list arguably more
popular image processing tools (e.g., ImageJ, OpenCV), and the list
seems arbitrarily constructed. Far better would be to add links from
each of the algorithms' pages to the software that implements that
particular algorithm.
Ray Jones

[Karol M. Langner]

Post by Thouis (Ray) Jones

Post by Luis Pedro Coelho
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_image_processing_software
and added the Python column.

I think a better ideas is to mark the article for deletion (and I've
done so), as it's meaningless (any of those algorithms could be coded
in python, matlab, or mathematica), it doesn't list arguably more
popular image processing tools (e.g., ImageJ, OpenCV), and the list
seems arbitrarily constructed. Far better would be to add links from
each of the algorithms' pages to the software that implements that
particular algorithm.
Ray Jones

I had exactly the same impression.